Introduction
This skill reviews scientific and engineering manuscripts for logical flow, structure, terminology, evidence strength, and clarity while preserving technical meaning. Findings are located and prioritized, revisions remain separate from commentary, and scientific claims that cannot be resolved from the text are returned to the author. It does not alter data meaning or smooth over evidence and method gaps for the sake of fluent prose.
Use Cases
Use it before submission, during revision, for cross-language editing, abstract compression, or response-to-review preparation. It identifies argument gaps, overinterpretation, shifting definitions, figure-text inconsistencies, and mismatches among the abstract, main text, and conclusion.
Template
Provide the manuscript, target journal, field, review depth, protected terminology, and reviewer comments. The output includes an overall diagnosis, located issues, revised text, change notes, and author queries.
